Agile metrics provide visibility into team progress, product value, delivery efficiency, and improvement opportunities. Task 2, “Manage Agile Metrics,” emphasizes the agile leader’s responsibility to select, track, communicate, and apply meaningful metrics that align with agile values and support informed decisions.
Metrics in agile are not just about productivity — they are tools for transparency, learning, and collaboration. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (particularly in Section 5.4) highlights how to leverage metrics such as velocity, cycle time, and cumulative flow diagrams, while cautioning against misuse or vanity metrics.
In the agile context, metrics should never be used to micromanage individuals but to empower teams, reveal patterns, and improve delivery outcomes.
Enabler 1: Determine Which Metrics Are Appropriate for a Given Audience
Different stakeholders have different information needs. Agile practitioners must understand the audience (e.g., team, product owner, executives) and tailor the metrics accordingly.
Examples include:
- Team-level: Velocity, sprint burndown, defect trends
- Product owners: Feature cycle time, value delivered, backlog health
- Executives: Release predictability, ROI, time-to-market
Choosing the wrong metrics (e.g., using story points to evaluate individual performance) can damage trust, distort behavior, or drive poor decision-making.
When selecting metrics, leaders should consider:
- Relevance: Does it reflect what matters to this audience?
- Clarity: Can it be easily interpreted?
- Actionability: Does it lead to meaningful insight or decision?
Effective metric selection creates alignment and promotes evidence-based conversations.
Enabler 2: Radiate Metrics Across the Relevant Audience
Radiating metrics means making them visible, accessible, and current to those who need them. Agile teams use information radiators — such as digital dashboards, wall boards, and performance indicators — to ensure transparency and collective awareness.
Metrics can be radiated:
- In real-time via tools like Jira, Azure DevOps, or Tableau
- Physically on team walls using Kanban boards, burndown charts, etc.
- During regular events (e.g., sprint reviews, retrospectives, stakeholder syncs)
The goal is to remove ambiguity about progress, risk, and value. Teams should avoid hidden or siloed reports and instead promote shared ownership of performance.
Radiated metrics encourage self-correction and foster collaboration, but they must be interpreted thoughtfully to avoid miscommunication.
Enabler 3: Review and Analyze Metrics
Once metrics are collected and shared, agile teams must regularly inspect them to uncover insights, patterns, and improvement opportunities. This often happens in retrospectives, planning sessions, or roadmap reviews.
For example:
- A drop in velocity might prompt an analysis of team capacity or story complexity.
- An increase in cycle time may reveal workflow bottlenecks.
- Poor release predictability might signal excessive WIP or scope creep.
Teams can also use trend analysis, cumulative flow diagrams, and control charts to study variability and flow.
Simply tracking metrics without reflection is a wasted opportunity. The review process turns raw data into meaningful narrative and guides adaptive change.
Enabler 4: Use Metrics Insights for Decision Making
Agile is about empirical process control — using observation and feedback to guide next steps. Metrics serve as a crucial input into that feedback loop.
Teams use metric insights to:
- Adjust sprint scope or cadence
- Prioritize backlog items
- Refine Definition of Done or working agreements
- Identify systemic blockers or improvement areas
For example, if sprint burndown charts consistently show unfinished work, the team might decide to improve estimation accuracy or reduce WIP.
Leaders must guard against data-driven dogmatism — metrics should inform, not dictate. Human context, team sentiment, and customer feedback are equally important inputs.
Data is most useful when it fuels informed dialogue, not rigid control.
Summary Points
- Metrics should be tailored to the needs of each stakeholder group.
- Visibility of metrics supports transparency, accountability, and collaboration.
- Metrics must be regularly reviewed and interpreted in context to identify trends and opportunities.
- Insights from metrics support adaptive planning and continuous improvement.
- Agile metrics should never be used for individual performance management.
- The best metrics promote learning, not just measurement.
Test Your Knowledge
To complete this task, take a micro-exam to assess your understanding.
You can start the exam by using the floating window on the right side of your desktop screen or the grey bar at the top of your mobile screen.
Alternatively, you can access the exam via the My Exams page: 👉 KnowledgeMap.pm/exams
Look for the exam with the same number and name as the current PMI-ACP ECO Task.
After completing the exam, review your overall score for the task on the Knowledge Map: 👉 KnowledgeMap.pm/map
To be fully prepared for the actual exam, your score should fall within the green zone or higher, which indicates a minimum of 70%. However, aiming for at least 75% is recommended to strengthen your knowledge, boost your confidence, and improve your chances of success.